U.S. court lets House move forward with challenge to Trump’s border wall

By Jan Wolfe

© Reuters/CARLOS BARRIA
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Trump visits the U.S.-Mexico border in San Luis, Arizona

(Reuters) – A federal appeals court handed a win to the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday, saying the Democratic-led chamber could proceed with a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s diversion of funds to pay for a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Load Error

Reversing a lower court judge, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said in a 3-0 decision that the House had legal standing to sue Trump for using money to build the wall that was appropriated by Congress for other purposes.

The case now returns to a lower court, where House Democrats will argue that diverting the funds violated the separation of powers doctrine laid out in the U.S. Constitution.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Justice, which argued for the administration in the case, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wall was Trump’s signature 2016 campaign promise, and at the time he insisted that Mexico would pay for it. Mexico never agreed to that and has not done so.

The three-judge panel cited an Aug. 7 ruling by the same court that a House panel could sue to enforce a subpoena issued to former White House Counsel Don McGahn. That case was later dismissed on other grounds.

In February 2019, after a protracted political battle and a government shutdown, Congress approved $1.38 billion for construction of “primary pedestrian fencing” along the border in southeastern Texas, well short of Trump’s demands.

To obtain additional funds for the wall, Trump declared a national emergency and his administration said it planned to divert $601 million from a Treasury Department forfeiture fund, $2.5 billion earmarked for Department of Defense counterparties programs and $3.6 billion from military construction projects.

(Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Editing by Nick Zieminski)

Video: Trump asks court to let WeChat ban proceed (CNBC)

Trump asks court to let WeChat ban proceed

Click to expand

• 
  Open Supreme Court seat energizing pro-life voters
  The White House is pushing forward, quickly, in its decision on who it will choose to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The possibility has energized evangelical voters and anti-abortion activists across the country. NBC’s Ellison Barber joins Steve Kornacki to share what she’s hearing from pro-life voters.
  
  MSNBC
  
  

• 
  Ruth Bader Ginsburg becomes first woman to lie in state in Capitol
  Kasie Hunt brings the latest from Capitol Hill where Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg became the first woman to lie in state in the Capitol, says “from a political perspective, we very quickly got right back to status quo.”
  
  MSNBC
  
  

• 
  Former law clerk: Ginsburg pursued justice ‘until the very end’
  Lisa Frelinghuysen, former law clerk to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joins Andrea Mitchell to remember the late justice and the impact she had. Recalling a Hebrew phrase Ginsburg had inscribed on her wall, Frelinghuysen says of her, “Justice, justice, you must pursue, is exactly what she did always until the very end.”
  
  MSNBC
  
  

UP NEXT