U.S. Court Lets House Move Forward With Challenge to Trump’s Border Wall | Top News

(Reuters) – A federal appeals court handed a win to the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday, saying the Democratic-led chamber could proceed with a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s diversion of funds to pay for a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Reversing a lower court judge, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said in a 3-0 decision that the House had legal standing to sue Trump for using money to build the wall that was appropriated by Congress for other purposes.

The case now returns to a lower court, where House Democrats will argue that diverting the funds violated the separation of powers doctrine laid out in the U.S. Constitution.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Justice, which argued for the administration in the case, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wall was Trump’s signature 2016 campaign promise, and at the time he insisted that Mexico would pay for it. Mexico never agreed to that and has not done so.

The three-judge panel cited an Aug. 7 ruling by the same court that a House panel could sue to enforce a subpoena issued to former White House Counsel Don McGahn. That case was later dismissed on other grounds.

In February 2019, after a protracted political battle and a government shutdown, Congress approved $1.38 billion for construction of “primary pedestrian fencing” along the border in southeastern Texas, well short of Trump’s demands.

To obtain additional funds for the wall, Trump declared a national emergency and his administration said it planned to divert $601 million from a Treasury Department forfeiture fund, $2.5 billion earmarked for Department of Defense counterparties programs and $3.6 billion from military construction projects.

(Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Editing by Nick Zieminski)

Copyright 2020 Thomson Reuters.

Source Article

Read more

U.S. court lets House move forward with challenge to Trump’s border wall

By Jan Wolfe



a man standing in front of a building: FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Trump visits the U.S.-Mexico border in San Luis, Arizona


© Reuters/CARLOS BARRIA
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Trump visits the U.S.-Mexico border in San Luis, Arizona

(Reuters) – A federal appeals court handed a win to the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday, saying the Democratic-led chamber could proceed with a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s diversion of funds to pay for a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Loading...

Load Error

Reversing a lower court judge, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said in a 3-0 decision that the House had legal standing to sue Trump for using money to build the wall that was appropriated by Congress for other purposes.

The case now returns to a lower court, where House Democrats will argue that diverting the funds violated the separation of powers doctrine laid out in the U.S. Constitution.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Justice, which argued for the administration in the case, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wall was Trump’s signature 2016 campaign promise, and at the time he insisted that Mexico would pay for it. Mexico never agreed to that and has not done so.

The three-judge panel cited an Aug. 7 ruling by the same court that a House panel could sue to enforce a subpoena issued to former White House Counsel Don McGahn. That case was later dismissed on other grounds.

In February 2019, after a protracted political battle and a government shutdown, Congress approved $1.38 billion for construction of “primary pedestrian fencing” along the border in southeastern Texas, well short of Trump’s demands.

To obtain additional funds for the wall, Trump declared a national emergency and his administration said it planned to divert $601 million from a Treasury Department forfeiture fund, $2.5 billion earmarked for Department of Defense counterparties programs and $3.6 billion from military construction projects.

(Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Editing by Nick Zieminski)

Video: Trump asks court to let WeChat ban proceed (CNBC)

Read more

WV Farm2Fork: Let’s all get in the kitchen! | Food & Dining

The times they are changing!

It used to be this time of year we were all scrambling to pick up school supplies and preparing for weekends of tailgating, sports and fall fun. Scheduling rides and activities was top on our list.

This year, things are different. We’re scheduling meetings and school from home, facing a season with no tailgate parties at the games and getting into a routine that is challenging and changing every week.

Whether there’s one of you, two of you or more of you, you can enjoy some quick and tasty recipes that will fit the bill for dinners, snacks and desserts.

Using a mix of West Virginia-made products from WV Marketplace and fresh foods from The Purple Onion and other Capitol Market vendors, families can have some fun in the kitchen making dishes that are a little different and easy.

I’ll be doing my tailgating — with kids — in our family cave. I’d like to call it a man cave, but that would be a fantasy, like fall sports season!

Two recipes that we’ll try this fall are a Giardiniera Dip and Poor Man’s Shrimp with Cocktail Sauce.

Oliverio’s sauces are quality products with a homemade taste that makes them a favorite for many of our customers. You might know them as great on pastas and pizzas, but take a minute to try them to make quick work of Chicken Cacciatore and meatloaf and you’ll be sold on their versatility.

The dip features Oliverio’s Giardiniera in a quick blender recipe that is great on crackers, with an Italian antipasti tray or slathered on just about anything you can put between two slices of bread. If we need a quick dinner later in the day, it might be Beef, Macaroni and Pepper Skillet Dish with Oliverio’s Peppers in Sauce. This is another recipe that the company shares on its web site and we are including here. You could certainly switch out the ground beef for ground chicken, turkey or pork if you prefer.

The shrimp cocktail recipe, originally named because it uses no shrimp, is also a great option if you have family and friends who are shell-fish intolerant. Cauliflower substitutes for the shellfish and the sauce is a tangy rendition using Copperhead Bloody Mary Mix. And for another quick tailgate or dinner with friends, you can use the same mix in a tasty and quick Gazpacho.

Copperhead/Appalachian Mountain Specialties is produced by Vandalia. Copperhead has a little more bite than other mixes. It’s a blend of tomato and lime juices, red wine vinegar, with a secret spice blend with an added kick of horseradish to give it a “bite” that you will love. If you’re thinking that soup or stew that’s been simmering for a while could use a little something-something, try adding a glug or two of this to the pot!

Serving veggies at your home tailgate or chicken nuggets to the family at lunch or dinner? Dress both dishes up with the Hawaiian

Read more